Six alleged coup plotters plead not guilty as Sylva remains at large

Six individuals accused of plotting to overthrow the administration of Bola Ahmed Tinubu have pleaded not guilty to charges of treason and terrorism in a high-profile trial at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

The defendants were arraigned on Wednesday before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, marking a major development in the federal government’s case over an alleged 2025 coup plot.

The 13-count charge, filed by the office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, names a mix of retired military officers, a serving police inspector, and civilians. Among those in court were retired Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, retired naval officer Erasmus Ochegobia Victor, and Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim. Others include Sheikh Abdulkadir Sani Zaria, Zekeri Umoru, and Bukar Kashim Goni.

However, a seventh suspect, former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources Timipre Sylva, was absent in court and is reportedly still at large. Prosecutors allege that Sylva played a role in concealing the plot and providing logistical support.

According to the charge sheet, the accused conspired in 2025 to “levy war against the state” and destabilize the government. Specific allegations include terrorism financing, concealment of intelligence related to the plot, and participation in clandestine operational meetings.

Following their not guilty pleas, the prosecution pushed for a speedy trial and requested that the defendants be remanded in the custody of the Department of State Services (DSS). Attempts by defense lawyers to secure bail through oral applications were rejected, with the court directing that formal written motions be filed.

Justice Abdulmalik subsequently adjourned the case to April 27 for the hearing of bail applications and further proceedings. Security around the court premises has been heightened as the trial begins.

The case is widely seen as a critical test of Nigeria’s judicial transparency, particularly as the government opts to prosecute the matter in an open civil court rather than a closed military tribunal.

Admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *