The African Democratic Congress(ADC) has rejected President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s directive authorising the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) to investigate the controversy surrounding the Peaceand Fitness for Prosperity Initiative Commmission (PFIPC), insisting that only an independent inquiry can guarantee transparency and public confidence.
The opposition party argued that the allegations surrounding the PFIPC are too significant to be handled solely through an investigation directed by the executive arm of government, calling instead for a broader and impartial probe.
In a statement, the ADC expressed concern over the Presidency’s decision to assign the ICPC to investigate the matter, saying the circumstances surrounding the alleged operation of the PFIPC require an inquiry that is free from any perception of political influence.
The party maintained that an independent panel or judicial commission of inquiry would be better suited to uncover the facts and ensure accountability.
According to the ADC, such an approach would enhance public trust in the outcome of the investigation and eliminate concerns about possible interference.
The controversy arose after the Presidency alleged that one Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew presented himself as the Director-General of the PFIPC, prompting questions over the agency’s legal status and activities.
Following the allegations, President Tinubu directed the ICPC to investigate the matter and submit its findings within 30 days.
The investigation is expected to determine whether the PFIPC was lawfully established, whether any false representations were made and whether any offences involving impersonation, fraud or abuse of public office were committed.
The ADC argued that the investigation should go beyond the actions of individuals and examine the circumstances that allowed the alleged organisation to operate.
The party called on the government to make the findings of any investigation public and ensure that anyone found culpable is prosecuted in accordance with the law, regardless of political affiliation or status.
It also urged relevant institutions to cooperate fully with investigators and provide all necessary documents relating to the PFIPC.
The opposition party stressed that allegations involving public institutions and the possible misuse of government authority should be handled with the highest level of transparency.
It said an independent investigation would help reassure Nigerians that the process is objective and that justice would be served without fear or favour.
The ADC further noted that accountability in public administration is essential to strengthening democratic institutions and restoring public confidence in governance.
As of the time of filing this report, the Presidency had not responded to the ADC’s call for an independent investigation beyond its earlier directive mandating the ICPC to conduct the probe.
Similarly, the ICPC had yet to issue a detailed statement outlining the scope of its investigation or respond to the opposition party’s concerns.
Political analysts say the outcome of the investigation is likely to attract significant public attention, as it could determine not only the legality of the PFIPC’s operations but also shape public perception of the government’s commitment to transparency and accountability.
